
Chemical safety failures: lessons from two recent cases
February 22, 2026
SIRA’s workers compensation fraud crackdown: why it matters for every employer
March 1, 2026WHS Right of Entry: Lessons in Site Security and Stopping Workplace Bullying From Union Officials
In the high-stakes world of Australian infrastructure, a principal contractor’s site entry policy is often the first line of defence.
The recent Federal Court ruling in B.M.D. Constructions Pty Ltd v CFMEU (No 3) [2026] FCA 169 highlights a growing tension on Brisbane worksites: the line between a Union’s “Right of Entry” and a worker’s right to a site free from harassment and bullying and drama. This case was terribly sad to read.
The Case: When Entry Becomes Obstruction
The Centenary Bridge Upgrade project became a legal battleground when BMD Constructions alleged that Union officials repeatedly bypassed safety protocols. While the legal technicalities focused on “non-admissions” in court, the underlying evidence revealed a disturbing pattern of behavior toward WHS staff.
Shocking Allegations of Workplace Bullying
One of the most engaging (and troubling) aspects of this case is the alleged conduct of officials toward site personnel attempting to enforce WHS inductions. Documentation and footage presented to the court detailed an environment of extreme intimidation, including:
- Gender-Based Harassment: Reports of officials making derogatory and highly inappropriate sexual comments to WHS staff, including phrases like “Do you want to look at my dick?” when asked for identification or to sign a register.
- Intimidation Tactics: Aggressive verbal abuse aimed at safety officers who were simply trying to fulfill their legal “Primary Duty of Care.”
- The “Blockade” Mentality: Allegations of physical obstruction that prevented concrete pours and disrupted the contractual flow of the project.
Why This Matters for the Construction Industry
For a PCBU, allowing this behaviour isn’t just a culture problem it’s a WHS breach. Under the Work Health and Safety Act, you have a legal obligation to protect your workers from psychological harm and bullying.
Critical Guidance for Principal Contractors
To protect your site and your staff, your WHS strategy must be proactive. Here is how to handle high-pressure Right of Entry situations:
1. Zero Tolerance for Harassment
- Document Every Word: Use body-worn cameras (where legal) or have a secondary witness present during entries. In the BMD case, the CCTV and body-cam footage were the primary reasons the Union couldn’t hide behind a “we don’t know” defence to all charges!
- Report Psychological Hazards: Verbal abuse like the sexual comments mentioned above should be logged as a safety incident. This builds a “paper trail” of behavioural risks that can be used in future court injunctions.
2. Enforce the “Induction First” Rule
The Court confirmed that a site induction is a valid WHS requirement.
- Don’t Waive Compliance: Even if a visitor claims a “Right of Entry,” they must still comply with reasonable WHS directions. If they refuse to sign the register or undergo a safety briefing, they are in breach of section 499 of the Fair Work Act.
3. Use the “BMD Evidence Formula”
The reason BMD won this procedural round is that their evidence was undeniable. To replicate this:
- Maintain Digital Logs: Store all visitor registers and “Notices of Entry” digitally and immediately.
- Identify the Individuals: Ensure your staff is trained to identify specific officials. The Union often tries to claim “corporate ignorance,” but clear footage of a specific person makes that defense impossible.
The Bottom Line
Workplace bullying is a safety hazard. Whether it’s an “idiot consultant” or an aggressive Union official making lewd comments, a PCBU must intervene. The BMD case proves that when you have the evidence, the court will no longer allow organizations to “play dumb” regarding the conduct of their representatives.
Important Links:
https://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/hazards-a-z/violence
https://www.nsw.gov.au/employment/mental-health-at-work
https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/workwell
WHS Right of Entry & Site Security Master Checklist
| Category | Action Item | Legal Reference | Responsibility | Best Practice for Difficult Situations |
| 1. ENTRY PERMITS | Verify valid WHS Entry Permit | s 125 WHS Act (QLD) | WHS Manager | If refused: No Entry. State clearly: “No permit, no access.” |
| 1. ENTRY PERMITS | Verify valid Federal Entry Permit | s 494 Fair Work Act | WHS Manager | Required for Union officials. Check expiry dates carefully. |
| 1. ENTRY PERMITS | Confirm Photo ID matches Permits | s 125 WHS Act | WHS Manager | Official must prove they are the permit holder. |
| 2. SAFETY LOGS | Complete Site Safety Induction | s 128 WHS Act / BMD Case | Visitor / Official | Mandatory. Refusal to induct is a breach. Stop work if they bypass. |
| 2. SAFETY LOGS | Sign Visitor / Site Register | BMD v CFMEU [2026] | Visitor / Official | Essential for emergency muster and court evidence. |
| 2. SAFETY LOGS | Inspect PPE Compliance | WHS Regulation | WHS Manager | Must meet site standards (Steel caps, Hi-vis, Hard hat, etc.). |
| 3. EVIDENCE | Activate Body-Cam / Recording | s 37M FCA (Evidence) | WHS/Site Manager | Do not wait for conflict. Record from the first “Hello” at the gate. |
| 3. EVIDENCE | Record Detailed Site Diary Entry | Federal Court Evidence | WHS Manager | Log specific times, names, and exact quotes used by officials. |
| 4. BEHAVIOUR | Challenge “Improper Conduct” | s 500 Fair Work Act | Site Manager | Quote lewd/abusive remarks directly in the log for “Improper Manner.” |
| 4. BEHAVIOUR | Stop Psychological Harassment | PCBU Duty of Care | PCBU / PM | If staff are bullied (e.g. sexual comments), direct official to leave. |
| 4. BEHAVIOUR | Manage Exclusion Zone Breaches | s126 WHS Act | All Staff | If official enters a high-risk zone, call an Emergency Stop immediately. |
| 5. SITE CONTROL | Prevent Physical Obstruction | s146 WHS Act | Project Manager | If blocking concrete pours or gates, document as “Hindering/Obstructing.” |
| 5. SITE CONTROL | Verify “Reasonable Suspicion” | s117 WHS Act | WHS Manager | Ask: “What is the specific safety risk?” They cannot just “fish” for issues. |




